Review of Rogue Teens
| Date | June 1, 2006 |
|---|---|
| Author: | Kelly |
| Score: | 64 / 100 |
| Good: | Not a lot good about it. |
| Medium: | Average looking teens, in average sets. |
| Bad: | Not enough content for the money. |
| Pricing: | $24.99 / 30 days |
| Images: | 82 picture sets |
Rogue Teens
Summary
Porn-power
- Average looking teens in fairly good picture shoots. It got my pants dented, but didn't get me to whip out my cock. Very plain teen porn with no specific features.
- Acceptable resolution, but some pictures seem a bit amateur.
- There are 82 picture sets, compared to other teen sites that is very little content. -No videos and infrequent updates.
- One picture set posted each week. Sometimes a single shoot is even distributed over several updates.
- Very few promises are made, but at least they are all kept as far as I can tell.
- Fairly messy for a small site like this, but it isn't so bad you'll get confused.
- Server speed seems good, and links work as they should.
My opinion
RogueTeens is, as the name suggests, a teen site. The teen niche is a crowded place, and a good site needs something unique to offer or massive amounts of content, if it's standard teen pictures. This site has neither.
The site is offers pictures exclusively. No videos, nothing except pictures. -And they're just plain, generic teen porn pictures, probably not even exclusive. There aren't even many of them. I currently count 82 updates, each containing around 75 pictures.
The sets are split in 9 standard categories: Lesbian, Solo, Brunettes, Blondes, Red-heads, Big-breasted, Small-breasted and finally Toys. All categories cover over very standard teen-pictures. The shoots range from very softcore to more explicit lesbian sex. The softcore shoots could be, for example: Starting out in lingerie, and 30 repeat poses later dropping the bra, and then after another 35 repeats the set ends. The more explicit sets feature single-girl masturbation, sometimes with toys, or standard lesbian sex scenes.
Tech-stuff
Picture resolution is about 870x650, a mediocre resolution that gives fine quality in normal size, but will already degrade sligthly in full-screen. Most pictures seem fairly professional, but a minority seemed kind of amateur, judging by lighting, focus etc. Some are retouched or recompressed to a point where they just seem like one big blur.
Navigation is fairly simple, the front page gives you links to the latest galleries, and to each of the nine categories. Inside the categories there are thumbnailed links to all the galleries matching the category. Not much to it. The design is not very nice in my opinion, and it kind of clutters up the interface making the whole thing look more complicated than it is.
The pages load fast, as do pictures, and all links work, so surfability-wise the site is OK.
The site is offers pictures exclusively. No videos, nothing except pictures. -And they're just plain, generic teen porn pictures, probably not even exclusive. There aren't even many of them. I currently count 82 updates, each containing around 75 pictures.
The sets are split in 9 standard categories: Lesbian, Solo, Brunettes, Blondes, Red-heads, Big-breasted, Small-breasted and finally Toys. All categories cover over very standard teen-pictures. The shoots range from very softcore to more explicit lesbian sex. The softcore shoots could be, for example: Starting out in lingerie, and 30 repeat poses later dropping the bra, and then after another 35 repeats the set ends. The more explicit sets feature single-girl masturbation, sometimes with toys, or standard lesbian sex scenes.
Tech-stuff
Picture resolution is about 870x650, a mediocre resolution that gives fine quality in normal size, but will already degrade sligthly in full-screen. Most pictures seem fairly professional, but a minority seemed kind of amateur, judging by lighting, focus etc. Some are retouched or recompressed to a point where they just seem like one big blur.
Navigation is fairly simple, the front page gives you links to the latest galleries, and to each of the nine categories. Inside the categories there are thumbnailed links to all the galleries matching the category. Not much to it. The design is not very nice in my opinion, and it kind of clutters up the interface making the whole thing look more complicated than it is.
The pages load fast, as do pictures, and all links work, so surfability-wise the site is OK.
Conclusion
In my opinion RogueTeens is best compared to a teen TGP. -The content seems as "random" as on TGPs, just plain teen porn. The amount of content on the site is equal to what a good TGP posts in a day, and a TGP site is free. This site has much less to offer than most free TGPs, so don't waste your time and money on it.
Visit Rogue Teens
Porn-power
10/20
Content quality
10/20
Value for money
10/20
Updates
3/10
As promised
10/10
Navigation
7/10
Surfability
10/10
Total Score
64/100
:: Screenshots ::
