
Review of Pantyhose amateurs
| Date | May 4, 2006 |
|---|---|
| Author: | Topcat |
| Score: | 63 / 100 |
| Pricing: | $34.99 - Monthly $79.99 - 3 Months |
Pantyhose amateurs
Porn-power
This site features all types of pantyhose, stockings and lingerie: Fishnet, back seam, crotchless, seamless, black stockings, white stockings, criss cross, nylon, silk, cotton, satin, see-through pantyhose and so on.
The site is made by a serious upskirt, pantyhose, leg, feet and lingerie fetishist, and you need to be serious about it too, if you're going to enjoy this site. It is not another pantyhose site where the videos actually feature 2 minutes pantyhose and 28 minutes sex. Videos as well as pictures are 100% focused on the pantyhose or lingerie they display.
Many updates feature the girls grinding their pantyhose in their crotch, making an alternative and quite sexy version of a cameltoe or simply ripping them to shreds. I miss audio on these scenes, 'cause after all, what is ripping a pair of sexy pantyhose worth, if you can't hear the crunchy noise it makes?
Most videos do not have audio, normally this would go in the tech section of this review, but I feel the muteness is so "loud" it affects the porn-power too. In the scenario above it would be appropriate with sound. In other scenes, where the girls are moving rythmically it would have been nice with some soft music. Of course you are free to put that on your stereo while watching :)
The girls are generally quite hot, and the site mostly has young teen models. There are however a few that are a bit more mature looking, and the average look is more mature than for example amateurupskirts. There are both porn stars such as Trinity Maxx, penthouse pet Sunny Leone and less known amateur cuties.
The archive currently holds around 80 videos and about 65 picture updates. There is an average of about 80-100 pics per update, a video update is around 20 minutes long. The tour claims daily updates wich is not true, updates are only posted once a week. I saw some picture updates that were nothing but screencaps from last weeks video update. It is clear to see that this site is not the primary priority of the webmaster.
When you subscribe to any of the three sites run by this guy you also get access to the other two. For this one that means that the bonus consists of MichelleLynn.com and AmateurUpskirts.com, both of which are good sites.
-However I think that most upskirt fans can enjoy pantyhose fetish too, but not all pantyhose fetishists will enjoy a general upskirt site. Therefore I think that while this site adds value to the upskirt site, the upskirt site does not add much value to this site.
12 / 20 porn-power, for concentrating on the pantyhose and lingerie. There isn't nearly enough content yet, and with the slow update speed I doubt there will be in the near future. Lying about update frequency in the tour also drags down.
An important notice to hardcore lovers: This is not the site for you, everything is softcore, and you won't see a single cock !
The site is made by a serious upskirt, pantyhose, leg, feet and lingerie fetishist, and you need to be serious about it too, if you're going to enjoy this site. It is not another pantyhose site where the videos actually feature 2 minutes pantyhose and 28 minutes sex. Videos as well as pictures are 100% focused on the pantyhose or lingerie they display.
Many updates feature the girls grinding their pantyhose in their crotch, making an alternative and quite sexy version of a cameltoe or simply ripping them to shreds. I miss audio on these scenes, 'cause after all, what is ripping a pair of sexy pantyhose worth, if you can't hear the crunchy noise it makes?
Most videos do not have audio, normally this would go in the tech section of this review, but I feel the muteness is so "loud" it affects the porn-power too. In the scenario above it would be appropriate with sound. In other scenes, where the girls are moving rythmically it would have been nice with some soft music. Of course you are free to put that on your stereo while watching :)
The girls are generally quite hot, and the site mostly has young teen models. There are however a few that are a bit more mature looking, and the average look is more mature than for example amateurupskirts. There are both porn stars such as Trinity Maxx, penthouse pet Sunny Leone and less known amateur cuties.
The archive currently holds around 80 videos and about 65 picture updates. There is an average of about 80-100 pics per update, a video update is around 20 minutes long. The tour claims daily updates wich is not true, updates are only posted once a week. I saw some picture updates that were nothing but screencaps from last weeks video update. It is clear to see that this site is not the primary priority of the webmaster.
When you subscribe to any of the three sites run by this guy you also get access to the other two. For this one that means that the bonus consists of MichelleLynn.com and AmateurUpskirts.com, both of which are good sites.
-However I think that most upskirt fans can enjoy pantyhose fetish too, but not all pantyhose fetishists will enjoy a general upskirt site. Therefore I think that while this site adds value to the upskirt site, the upskirt site does not add much value to this site.
12 / 20 porn-power, for concentrating on the pantyhose and lingerie. There isn't nearly enough content yet, and with the slow update speed I doubt there will be in the near future. Lying about update frequency in the tour also drags down.
An important notice to hardcore lovers: This is not the site for you, everything is softcore, and you won't see a single cock !
Technical quality, navigation
Pictures are in focus, in nice settings and alltogether just look professional. The resolution is not consistent, but most pictures are only 640x420, a lot more should be expected of a site today ! -To be fair I think the webmaster has a new camera now, and chances are that most pictures will be 1024x768 from now on.
Videos come as full clips in WMV, windows media player format, in several different qualities (up to 1000 kbit/s), plus MPG format. Shorter clips are also available WMV format. Resolution is up to 480x320, and that is absolutely acceptable, even in fullscreen. Most clips do not have audio, the webmaster gives a reasonable explanation of this on his video-help page, still the muteness is deafening, and it pulls down the tech rate also. Some clips do have audio.
Every link is clearly stating the bit-rate, resolution and format of the clip it points to.
The site design is clean and it works. Navigation is ultra-simple, and works well. Everything is clearly linked to directly from the front page.
I miss 3 things on this site: A way to download picture updates in one big file, thumbnails for each of the smaller video clips in updates and a slideshow feature for pictures.
Although most things are in order I don't think it is acceptable to still release new pictures in 640x420 resolution or videos with no sound. Also some updates are slightly under lit, which means you may have to fiddle around with contrast and color balance to get the optimal picture.
Videos come as full clips in WMV, windows media player format, in several different qualities (up to 1000 kbit/s), plus MPG format. Shorter clips are also available WMV format. Resolution is up to 480x320, and that is absolutely acceptable, even in fullscreen. Most clips do not have audio, the webmaster gives a reasonable explanation of this on his video-help page, still the muteness is deafening, and it pulls down the tech rate also. Some clips do have audio.
Every link is clearly stating the bit-rate, resolution and format of the clip it points to.
The site design is clean and it works. Navigation is ultra-simple, and works well. Everything is clearly linked to directly from the front page.
I miss 3 things on this site: A way to download picture updates in one big file, thumbnails for each of the smaller video clips in updates and a slideshow feature for pictures.
Although most things are in order I don't think it is acceptable to still release new pictures in 640x420 resolution or videos with no sound. Also some updates are slightly under lit, which means you may have to fiddle around with contrast and color balance to get the optimal picture.
Conclusion
This site is for pantyhose fetishists, and if you have a serious fetish then it is definetely worth a months membership. However at the low rate updates are coming I can't possibly tell you it is worth a permanent subscription !
Unless you are into upskirts too this is only a 12 / 20 value for money. The quantity of content is not equal to the price. Upskirt lovers may consider a subscription because of the free access to amateurupskirts.com which is a good site.
Unless you are into upskirts too this is only a 12 / 20 value for money. The quantity of content is not equal to the price. Upskirt lovers may consider a subscription because of the free access to amateurupskirts.com which is a good site.
Visit Pantyhose amateurs
Porn-power
12/20
Value for money
12/20
Technical quality
14/20
Total Score
63/100



